May 4, 2011

Rewriting slugs based on rewritten titles | CyberSEO Pro | Support Forum

Avatar

Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_TopicIcon
Rewriting slugs based on rewritten titles
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
November 6, 2015
6:43 am
Avatar
jtt200
Guest
Guests

Is there any way you could add slug rewriting to the plugin (they would be the same as spun title of a post). Wordpress Auto Spinner plugin has something like this built in, so it is a doable thing:

Login to see this link

URL slugs which are based on titles are good for traffic from search, and if I would like to do bulk posting with Cyber Seo (like 1,000 posts per day, lets say) rewriting the slugs to be the same as tiltes, really slows things down.

Post title: Rewriting slugs so they match titles for better seo

Slug: domain.com/rewriting-slugs-so-they-match-titles-for-better-seo

This would be a VERY needed thing. I would say that it is missing from the current version, and it just should be there.

Thanks.

November 10, 2015
5:27 am
Avatar
CyberSEO
Admin
Forum Posts: 3913
Member Since:
July 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'll look at what I can do about it. However I can't promise it will be implemented in the current 6th version of plugin.

November 14, 2015
3:48 am
Avatar
jtt200
Guest
Guests

I would need to say that this needs to be looked at something that should be there long time ago, and it is missing, so it is a priority thing. Basically, people have post titles that are different that url slugs, and it is better if they are the same. So if I want to accumulate 1000 posts per day, quickly review them and schedule them, lets say, I can either just look at the content of the post, delete some unnecessary text / tags, and move on. With the current state, I need to rewrite every single url slug by hand, which really slows things down, I would say.

I mean, if this is something that can be corrected programmatically, and if it is not hard, it could save most of the people who use it a lot of time.

I don't need it right at this moment, but in general this would be a priority thing. Something that should have been there from the start...

December 13, 2015
9:47 am
Avatar
Freedom
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 61
Member Since:
May 11, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi Cyber,

I too would like this feature, and I was curious as to where it might be on your list of things to do?

Cheers

Forum Timezone: Europe/Amsterdam

Most Users Ever Online: 541

Currently Online: jeremyboucher
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

ninja321: 84

s.baryshev.aoasp: 68

Freedom: 61

Pandermos: 54

MediFormatica: 49

B8europe: 48

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 337

Members: 2817

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 5

Topics: 1627

Posts: 8280

Newest Members:

igor.buzaev, jeremyboucher, lthompson2709, MAC, duty3canada, backlinkmorocco

Administrators: CyberSEO: 3913